March 14, 2025

Samagra Sharma
Founder

Framework Benchmarking: Which Inference Engine is Fastest?
When serving an LLM, throughput (measured in tokens per second, TPS) is a key metric. Below is a comparative analysis of top inference frameworks running 7B models on an Nvidia A100 (FP16):| Framework | TPS (7B Model) | Key Features & Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| vLLM | 130-1800 | PagedAttention, dynamic batching |
| SGLang | ~180-5000 | RadixAttention, prefix-sharing |
| TensorRT-LLM | 220-743 | Nvidia-optimized, FP8 support |
| Triton Server | 160-200 | Dynamic batching, multi-framework |
| Llama.cpp | 20-90 | CPU support, lightweight |
| mistral.rs | ~150-200 | Rust-based, CPU/GPU efficiency |
| TGI (HF) | 180-220 | Hugging Face integration, multi-GPU |
- High throughput needs? vLLM, SGLang, and TensorRT-LLM are top choices.
- CPU-based inference? Llama.cpp or mistral.rs are strong contenders.
- Seamless Hugging Face model serving? TGI is well-integrated.
- Enterprise-scale NVIDIA deployments? TensorRT-LLM + Triton offers peak performance.
Key Optimization Techniques for LLM Inference
- In-Flight Continuous Batching In-flight continuous batching merges new requests into a batch mid-generation, maximizing GPU efficiency. It prevents GPUs from sitting idle between requests. This results in up to 3.5x throughput increase over naive request processing.
- FastAPI Alone Won’t Cut It FastAPI is great for APIs but struggles with high-throughput inference because Python’s GIL introduces latency, manual batching is inefficient, no built-in GPU scheduling.
- KV Cache Optimization If your use case involves repetitive prompts or multi-turn interactions with shared context, consider prefix-caching strategies.

